SALES / SUPPORT : +1-877-525-5646   |  


Industry leading Corporate Aircraft Support Company needs a new logo

Stellar (Aero can also be included)

Contest Holder bradkost ?

Last Logged in : 3235days5hrs ago

Concepts Submitted

116

Guaranteed Prize
250
Winner(s)

1

A Logo, Monogram, or Icon veildAll design entries are veiled from other designers till the end of the contest.
tick_gray

Live Project

tick_gray

Deciding

tick_blue

Project Finalized


Project: Industry leading Corporate Aircr ...
Industry: Aerospace Logo
Contest Launched: Dec 02, 2014
Selected: 1 winning design from 116 concepts
Winning Design by: vikilogos
Close Date: Dec 13, 2014


	Industry leading Corporate Aircraft Support Company needs a new logo - Aerospace


Awarded as a winner
Project Report    

Sort by:


#25

#24

#23

#21

#15

#14

#13

#12

#26

#107

#106

#101

#93

#92

#91

#90

#89

#88

#87

#86

#85

#84

#83

#82

#81

#80

#79


Creative Brief


Industry leading Corporate Aircraft Support Company needs a new logo

Stellar (Aero can also be included)

Yes

We need a new logo for our Company Stellar Aero. We provide flight support and private terminals and hangars throughout the country for private aircraft. We are catering to very discerning clientele and need a fresh logo. We are looking for a logo that is both refreshing and "green" but yet classy, elegant, and fun. Basically we take care of private Jets and smaller personal aircraft as well as Military and Commercial jets. We are looking for some form of badge to use with the logo... can be an initial.

Aerospace

Logo Type
Logo Type

Abstract Mark
Abstract Mark

Initials
Initials

Character
Character


Masculine
Modern
Cutting-edge
Casual
High Tech
Rustic

not sure

Related Contests


Logo for an Aviation Defense, Services and Logistics Consulting Company
$199
Prize Money
175
Concepts
Logo for a aviation consultancy firm
$200
Prize Money
78
Concepts
RTW
$200
Prize Money
44
Concepts
logo for a Private Jet Charter business that will be a club
$350
Prize Money
164
Concepts

Discussion


Comments