Logo for an environmental consulting firm

Comments

• September 18, 2012 8:47 PM
   mikecramer
    Project Holder
  Hi Everyone I have now chosen a winner for the design contest - it is Rayhon and logo number #132. It was a very close contest. I circulated the best designs to colleagues and friends and there were three types of designs that had the most support - logos #38/39 (MRyaN), logo #80 (aurelizza) and logos #132/45(Rayhon). In the end, it was the simplicity of the design that won it for #132. Thank you to everyone for your great contributions. Best of luck for the future Mike
  
  0   0
  
• September 14, 2012 7:15 AM
   fawwaz
   
  #155
  
  0   0
  
• September 13, 2012 11:41 PM
   mikecramer
    Project Holder
  Hi everyone Thanks again for all your great efforts and designs. I really appreciate it. I will now produce a short-list of the designs that I have rated 5 stars and show it to colleagues and friends to determine the winner. I expect to announce the winner next Wednesday 19 September at about 11.00 am Eastern Australian time. Regards Mike
  
  0   0
  
• September 13, 2012 6:18 PM
   mikecramer
    Project Holder
  Hi everyone - there are some great designs being produced - thank you so much. With 3 hours to go in the competition, I will upgrade the rating of my favourite logos (maybe 6 or so) to 5 stars. The 5-star logos will be the 'finalists' that will be in contention for the prize. If a really good logo comes in during the last 3 hours, then it will be added to the 5-star finalist list. Regards Mike
  
  0   0
  
• September 10, 2012 2:31 AM
   mikecramer
    Project Holder
  Hi everyone - there are some great logos being submitted. I am marking them low at the moment to give room to move as they get refined. All three of you are still in the running for the prize. I have asked for this site to be unveiled, as I have realised that you can't see each other's designs and therefore can't make full use of my comments. I will also guarantee the prize because I am happy with what I am seeing. I have made further comments below on the logos I have received so that everyone gets a better idea of what I am looking for. After that, I will either make general comments or contact you individually. #3 and #7 - In both cases, the logo is good but a bit too 'busy' for what I want. I would prefer a logo that is simpler. In #7, I like the clever use of the leaf in the A. It would be good to see if you can try this design again but a more streamlined. Also in #7, I like what you are trying to do to make the font of accent environmental flow and look modern/creative. However, I prefer the look of the word 'environmental' to the look of the word 'accent'. Adding in a visual of the business cards and stationery is useful, it makes me realise that the 'a' could look really good. #4 and #5 - Both of these are good. They capture the simplicity that I originally was looking for. The compact size of #5 is more practical. The use of bold to emphasize 'Accent' over 'Environmental' works, but you could also change font size - the main word that I want people to remember is 'Accent' - the 'environmental' is just to help explain what area the company works in. At the moment I prefer the #5 abstract design, but like both. I like the way they suggest movement and bring to mind the elements (water, wind, fire).
  
  0   0
  
• September 07, 2012 11:50 AM
   SiteAdmin
   
  Attention Designers!! MycroBurst permits you to submit unlimited designs with unlimited variations. However, if you are providing 2 or 3 different color versions of the same logo in one draft, please make sure that if the particular draft gets finalized, each color version should be separated before you will send the final files. Thanks, MB/LDG/LS Team
  
  0   0
  
• September 07, 2012 9:58 AM
   mikecramer
    Project Holder
  Thanks for these first two efforts! #1 - I really like this - I almost gave it four stars. I like the way the leaf flows and is in the general form of a tilde (i.e. picking up on the types of accents that used over letters in a word in many non-english languages) The colours are generally good too. Another thought is - maybe using a leaf logo makes the company seem too 'green' (perfect perhaps if we were revegetation contractors or ecologists, but we are not). The compact, rectangular shape is good as it would sit nicely in the header of a document, or could be easily balanced against the logo of another company on the front of a jointly branded report. The name is nice and prominent and I like having the smaller Environmental underneath the Accent. #2 I think the triangular shape of this logo (the abstract design and the text combined) is less practical than the more rectangular shape of #1. The company name would be hard to read when it was shrunk down in size. However, I do like the abstract design itself. Once again the shape and flow of the leaf is good and the proportions are good (it actually makes the leaf in the first logo look a little chunky in comparison). I like the way the little shadow brings it to life and seemingly has it weightless and hovering
  
  0   0